REVOLUTIONIZING ADULT LANGUAGE LEARNING: INNOVATIVE ENGLISH TEACHING TECHNIQUES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Essentially, delivering and receiving knowledge are the two main components of teaching. In the end, an educator does his best to teach the subject matter as he understood it. There are numerous educational options available to students of the current generation, but newer trends in education seem to have emerged that have completely changed the face of the traditional system of education. Utilizing innovative methods in educational institutions has the potential to not only improve education but also empower people, strengthen governance, and inspire the nation's efforts to achieve its human development goal. With its integration of the educational process, priority for quality over quantity, growing adoption of technologies, need for qualified workers, etc., recent trends, approaches, and advancements highlight the vital importance of the education sector in general. In the field of ELT as well, theories and practices are always changing. This article discusses the well-known ELT trends that have been used practically globally in recent years, paying particular attention to those that were popular in earlier decades.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Almekhlafi, A. (2006). The effect of Computer –Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on United Arab Emirates EFL School students’ achievement and attitude. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 121-142.
Current Trends in ELT by Yong Kim Journal of English Teaching. A Triannual Publication on the Study of English Language Teaching. Vol.1 Feb 2011.
Damon, W. and E. Phelps (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer Education, International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 9-19.
Elley, Warwick. 2001. Conclusion: What have we Learned? International Journal of Educational Research 35, pp.237-246. 5. Krashen, Stephen. 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal 73:4, pp.440-64