CURBING STUDENTS’ BULLYING AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL LEARNERS: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL BULLYING INTERVENTIONS

Main Article Content

Joseph Wambua Kioko
Dr Mukirae Njihia, PhD
Sr. Dr. Susan Mutune (PhD)

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to examine the effectiveness of bullying interventions in curbing students’ bullying in secondary schools in Machakos County. The study was anchored on social learning theory which expounds on the role played by one’s behavior and how this contributes to bullying among learners. The study used a descriptive survey research design to collect and analyse the primary data. A sample of 333 respondents was selected from a population of 116,053 respondents drawn from 36 schools. A questionnaire and interview guide were used as the key research instruments for the study. The collected data was analysed using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. The findings from the study revealed that students’ bullying among secondary schools in Machakos County was prevalent despite the interventions. It was further revealed that disciplinary interventions such as suspensions and punishments were upheld in most of the schools. Moreover, restorative interventions, anti-bullying programmes, and supportive interventions were found not to be effectively utilized in most of the schools, thus their ineffectiveness in eradicating bullying. The study concluded that bullying among students in secondary schools was prevalent due to ineffectiveness of interventions as they were inadequately implemented. It is therefore recommended that there is need for the school principals and other decision-makers to implement school interventions so as to effectively curb students’ bullying among secondary schools.

Article Details

How to Cite
Joseph Wambua Kioko, Dr Mukirae Njihia, PhD, & Sr. Dr. Susan Mutune (PhD). (2024). CURBING STUDENTS’ BULLYING AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL LEARNERS: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL BULLYING INTERVENTIONS. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 12(4), 396–411. Retrieved from https://internationaljournals.co.in/index.php/giirj/article/view/5485
Section
Articles

References

Ahn, J. N., Hu, D., & Vega, M. (2020). “Do as I do, not as I say”: Using social learning theory to unpack the impact of role models on students' outcomes in education. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2), e12517.

Akers, R. L., & Jensen, G. F. (2017). The empirical status of social learning theory of crime and deviance: The past, present, and future. Taking stock, 37-76.

Bandura, A. (1963). Social learning and personality development New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (2002). Growing Primacy of Human Agency in Adaptation and Change in the Electronic Era. European Psychologist. 7 (1): 2–16.

Bandura, A. (2004). Social Cognitive Theory for Personal and Social Change by Enabling Media. In Singhal, A.; Cody, M. J.; Rogers, E. M.; Sabido, M. (eds.). Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice. LEA's communication series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 75–96.

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall: Englewood cliffs.

Burger, C., & Bachmann, L. (2021). Perpetration and victimization in offline and cyber contexts: A variable- and person-oriented examination of associations and differences regarding domain-specific self-esteem and school adjustment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18 (19).

Carel, P., &Burkart, J. M. (2011). Social learning and evolution: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 366 (1567): 1008–1016.

Cho, E. & Chun, S. (2018). Fixing a broken clock: A historical review of the originators of reliability coefficients including Cronbach's alpha. Survey Research, 19(2), 23–54.

Cotton, T. (2016). Student discipline and motivation: Research synthesis. Portland: Northwest publishers.

Cowie, H. & Smith, P. K. (2010) Peer support as a means of improving school safety and reducing bullying and violence, in: W. Pfohl, J. Yoon & B. Doll (Eds) Handbook of youth prevention science (New York, Routledge), 177–193.

Eriksen, T. L., Nielsen, H. S., &Simonsen, M. (2014).Bullying in Elementary School. Journal of Human Resources, 49(4), 839-871.

Gabrielli, S., Rizzi, S., Carbone, S., &Piras, E. M. (2021). School Interventions for Bullying–Cyberbullying Prevention in Adolescents: Insights from the UPRIGHT and CREEP Projects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 11697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph182111697

Garandeau, C. F., Poskiparta, E., &Salmivalli, C. (2014).Tackling acute cases of school bullying in the KiVa anti-bullying program: A comparison of two approaches. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 42(6), 981-991.

Gershoff E.T., Lee S.J., &Durrant J.E. (2017).Promising intervention strategies to reduce parents’ use of physical punishment. Child Abuse Negligence, ;71:9–23. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.017.