EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Oct 10, 2022
Keywords:
robotics, STEM, robot, benefits of robotics, educational robotics complexes

Main Article Content

Vibornov S. A.
Senior Lecturer of the Department of "IT and its Teaching Methodology" Tashkent State Pedagogical University, Named after Nizami, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article discusses the basic concepts of educational robotics, the advantages and disadvantages of robots in education, as well as the types of robots most recommended for classroom learning. Development of cognitive skills of students when using robots in the learning process. Robotics has been endorsed by many researchers as an innovative learning tool with the potential to transform education and support learners in many learning contexts. Many researches show that robotics is an auxiliary tool for teaching subjects related to fields of robotics such as programming, construction or mechatronics.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vibornov S. A. (2022). EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(10), 140–146. Retrieved from https://internationaljournals.co.in/index.php/giirj/article/view/2568
Issue
Vol. 10 No. 10 (2022): GIIRJ
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

L. Gabriele, A. Tavernise, and F. BErtacchini, ``Active learning in a robotics laboratory with univErsity students,'' in Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using ImmErsive IntErfaces: Virtual Worlds, Gaming, and Simulation. Bingley, U.K.: EmErald Group Publishing Limited, 2012.

J. M. Angel-FErnandez and M. Vincze, ``Towards a formal definition of educational robotics,'' in Proc. Austrian Robot. Workshop, Jul. 2018, p. 37.

A. Eguchi, ``What is educational robotics? Theories behind it and practical implementation,'' in Proc. Soc. Inf. Technol. TeachEr Educ. Int. Conf., 2010, pp. 4006-4014.

A. Eguchi, ``Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation,''in Proc. 4th Int.Workshop Teaching Robot., Teach. Robot. 5th Int. Conf.Robot. Edu., 2014, pp. 1-8.

E. Ospennikova, M. Ershovb, and I. Iljin, ``Educational robotics as an innovative educational technology,'' Procedia-Social Behav. Sci.,vol. 214, pp. 18-26, Jan. 2015.

A. Eguchi and L. Uribe, ``Robotics to promote STEM learning: Educational robotics unit for 4th grade science,'' in Proc. IEEE Integr. STEM Edu. Conf. (ISEC), Mar. 2017, pp. 186-194.

L. A. Bragg, ``The effect of mathematical games on on-task behaviours in the primary classroom,'' Math. Edu. Res. J., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 385-401, Dec. 2012.

M. Prensky, ``Digital game-based learning,'' Comput. EntErtainment,vol. 1, no. 1, p. 21, 2003.

L. M. Takeuchi and S. Vaala, ``Level up learning: A national survey on teaching with digital games,'' in Proc. Joan Ganz Cooney CentEr Sesame Workshop, 2014, pp. 1-67.

P. Barth, ``Virtual schools: WhEre's the evidence,'' in Educational LeadErship, vol. 70, no. 6. Waynesville, NC, USA: LearnTechLib, 2013, pp. 32-36.

H. Morgan, ``Online instruction and virtual schools for middle and high school students: Twenty-First-Century fads or progressive teaching methods for Today's pupils?'' Clearing House, A J. Educ. Strategies, Issues Ideas, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 72-76, Mar. 2015.