Main Article Content

Sanjeev Kumar


Aside from having consequences at the biological model's local level, the pandemic has repercussions at the national level, in that it has a negative impact on social union and access to public administrations and institutions that house people's socially stimulating groups of individuals. The suspension or reduction of activities in temples, childcare centres, schools, and social insurance administrations, as well as the shifting of needs in health-care administrations to activities focused on patients with respiratory side effects and cases associated and confirmed with COVID-19, endangers the quest for assistance, assurance, and alternatives. The consistency and disarray of previous conditions of viciousness are accentuated by each of these factors. The length of time spent in touch with the attacker is a critical element at the social level. In addition, due of the reduction in the casualty's social contact with family members, the chances of the woman establishing and strengthening a socially supportive network of individuals, seeking assistance, and breaking free from the vicious cycle are reduced. Day by day continuous interaction, especially in low-wage families living in cramped quarters with few rooms and a lot of traffic, reduces the chances for women to record demonstrations in a safe manner, discouraging them from making this option. One problem that has received little attention from analysts, directors, and other members of the COVID-19 emergency panels is the impact of social separation on relational relationships, especially between intimate partners and between guardians and children, which is discussed in this debate. Global associations specialists and the established press have expressed concern over evidence of increasing aggressive behaviour at home, where the home has frequently become a source of fear and mistreatment as a result of previous social removing circumstances and the unexpected increase in reports of viciousness in the pandemic's specific situation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sanjeev Kumar. (2022). CYBER CRIME VIS-A-VIS DATA PRIVACY: DOCTRINAL INVESTIGATION. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(2), 167–176. Retrieved from


Nandini Tripathy, cyber crime against women and children during pandemic times, Pro bono India (2020).

Available at: (Last Modified July 27, 2021).

Available at: rise/article32399536.ece(Last Modified July 27, 2021).



Supra note 1 at 2.

Available at: (Last Modified July 02, 2021).

Supra note 6 at 4.

Available at: (Last Modified July 03, 2021).

Supra note 8.

Available at: of-crimes-against-women-in-june-highest-in-8-months/story XXf69w 9jnWi0dSbw3PhTjJ .html (Last Modified July 27, 2021).

Dr.Dilipkumar A. Ode & Mr.Jigeshkumar D. Chauhan, Current Major Issues In India (BOOKLET-2) 88 (RED’SHINE PUBLICATION PVT. LTD, 2020).

Sharma, D. (n.d.). Cyber crime in India: Are women a soft target. Legal Service India - Law, Lawyers and Legal Resources. available at: india-are-women-a-soft-target.html (Last Modified July 17, 2021).

Available at: (Last Modified July18, 2021).

Supra note 8 at 2.

Available at: (Last Modified July 27, 2021).

Supra note 16.

Available at: (Last Modified July 27, 2021).



Available at: (Last Modified July 27, 2021).