IMPROVING THE SYSTEM OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF FUTURE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS BASED ON INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17605/Keywords:
Innovative technologies, English language teacher education, professional competence, digital pedagogy, TPACK model, e-learning, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, blended learning, pre-service training.Abstract
The rapid evolution of digital technologies has fundamentally transformed all spheres of human activity, including education. This article presents a comprehensive study on improving the professional training system for future English language teachers through the integration of innovative technologies. Drawing on empirical research conducted with 120 pre-service English teachers at higher pedagogical institutions in Uzbekistan over the 2023–2024 academic year, the study examines the effectiveness of five major technological innovations: e-learning platforms, artificial intelligence-based language tools, virtual reality simulations, gamification, and multimedia-based instruction. Using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative assessment data and qualitative observation, the study demonstrates that technology-enriched training significantly enhances students’ professional competence, communicative skills, and pedagogical readiness. Findings reveal performance improvements ranging from 25% to 42% in key competency areas. The article proposes an integrated four-block model for pre-service teacher education and offers practical recommendations for curriculum designers, educators, and policymakers.
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
2. Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2023). Virtual reality in pre-service language teacher education: A mixed-methods study. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 45–68.
3. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.
4. Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Riding the digital wilds: Learner autonomy and informal language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 8–25.
5. Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
6. Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2022). Systematic review of AI in education: Methodological quality and synthesis. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100052.
7. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
9. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
10. Rakhimova, D., & Tashkentov, A. (2022). Blended learning in Uzbek EFL teacher preparation: Prospects and challenges. Uzbek Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 15–29.
11. Richards, J. C. (2011). Competence and Performance in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
13. UNESCO. (2023). Digital Competence Frameworks for Educators: Global Review and Recommendations. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
14. Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57–71.
15. Yusupova, N. (2021). ICT adoption among Uzbek university lecturers: Barriers and facilitators. Central Asian Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), 7–22.
16. Mirziyoev, Sh. M. (2022). New Uzbekistan Strategy. Tashkent: Uzbekistan Publishing House.
17. Ministry of Higher Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). State Program for the Development of Education 2030. Tashkent: Official Gazette.
18. Yo‘ldoshev, J. G‘. (2009). Pedagogical Technologies and Pedagogical Mastery. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi.
