ANTHROPONYMS IN COMMUNICATIVE REGISTERS OF MODERN RUSSIAN

Authors

  • Zhurayeva Ozoda Master’s Degree Student in Linguistics Russian Language Bukhara State University
  • Djuraeva Zulkhumor Radzhabovna Doctor of Philology DSc, Professor, Department of Russian Language and Literature Bukhara State University
  • Yusupova Alfiya Shavketovna Doctor of Sciences, Professor, Kazan Federal University Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Higher School of National Culture and Education named after Gabdulla Tukay Department of General Linguistics and Turkology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17605/

Keywords:

Anthroponymy, onomastics, patronymics, surnames, hypocoristics, pragmatics, identity, corpus.

Abstract

Russian anthroponyms operate as compact social signals that organise interaction, mark institutional distance, and stabilise identity across heterogeneous communicative environments. This article describes how the Russian anthroponymic system distributes forms of personal naming across registers, from bureaucratic documentation and academic discourse to everyday dialogue and digital platforms. Special attention is given to the interaction between structural components of the Russian naming formula first name patronymic surname and the pragmatic pressures of address, self presentation, and stance taking. The analysis integrates descriptive onomastics with corpus oriented observation and register based pragmatics, focusing on derivational mechanisms that generate hypocoristics, affectionate diminutives, evaluative nicknames, and Latin transliterated handles. Results demonstrate that the same referent may be represented by competing anthroponymic variants, each indexed to a specific social scene, participant roles, and expectations of politeness. The study also shows how contact settings in multilingual regions intensify hybrid naming practices, where Russian patronymics and surname morphology coexist with non Slavic given names.

References

1. Djuraeva Z. R. Approaches to the study of paremiology in Russian linguistics //European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 3. – С. 89-92.

2. Khamidovna N. L. et al. An Online Platform for Uzbek-Russian and Russian-Uzbek Parallel Corpora:: Linguistic Challenges and Prospects Exemplified by A. Kadyri's Novel “Bygone Days” //2024 9th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK). – IEEE, 2024. – С. 11-16.

3. Авезов С. О КОРПУСНОЙ ЛИНГВИСТИКЕ, ТРУДНОСТЯХ ПЕРЕВОДА И ПРИНЦИПАХ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ ПАРАЛЛЕЛЬНЫХ КОРПУСОВ ТЕКСТОВ //«УЗБЕКСКИЕ НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЕ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЕ ЗДАНИЯ ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКОЕ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКОЕ СОЗДАНИЕ ВОПРОСЫ" Международная научно-практическая конференция. – 2022. – Т. 1. – №. 1.

4. Бражник Л. М. Основы русской ономастики. – ООО ДиректМедиа, 2022.

5. Мурясов Р. З., Газизов Р. А. Антропонимы в системе языка //Вестник Башкирского университета. – 2015. – Т. 20. – №. 3. – С. 1017-1021.

6. Русское слово в тексте и в словаре : сборник / ред. коллегия: Г. В. Судаков (гл. ред.), С. Н. Смольников, Ю. И. Чайкина, Е. Н. Шаброва. – Вологда : ВГПУ, изд-во «Русь», 2003. – 179 с.

7. Смольников С. Н. Антропонимия в деловой письменности Русского Севера XVI-XVII вв. – Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

Issue

Section

Articles