POLITICAL FACTORS OF RELATIONS BETWEEN THE REPUBLICS OF UZBEKISTAN AND KYRGYZSTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17605/Keywords:
Globalization, state, economy, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, interstate cooperation, intensification, international institutions, democracy.Abstract
State cooperation has always played and continues to play a fundamental role in international relations, being one of the most effective mechanisms of interaction between other neighboring and remote States. The growing interdependence of the world, the emergence and aggravation of global problems and, as a result, the inability of States to solve these problems alone have greatly exacerbated the objective need to expand and intensify cooperation on the world stage. In the history of political thought, the problem of cooperation has been developed not only within the framework of the liberal-idealist paradigm, but also in the works of I. Kant, N. Machiavelli, G. Grotius, W. Wilson, F. Hegel and Thucydides. At the same time, each of the paradigms imposes its own characteristics on the specifics of the scientific development of this problem. For example, realists study this process without going beyond the framework of conflictology, believing that cooperation is organized where there is conflict or its threat.
References
1.Milner H.V. (2005) Globalization, Development, and International Institutions: Normative and Positive Perspectives // Perspectives on Politics.. Vol. 3. N 4.
2.Milner H.V., Mansfield E., Resendorff B.P. (2002). Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements // International Organization. N 56. P. 3.
3.Pevehouse J.C. (2002). Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization // International Organization. Summer. Vol. 56. N 3. P. 515—549.
4.Deutsch К. (1954) Political Community at the International Level. Problems of Definition and Measurement. N.Y.,; Idem. et al. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organisation in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, 1968; Idem. Nationalism and Social Communication. Cambridge. 1962; Idem. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. N.Y., 1963.
5.Мыльников М.А. (2022) Этнодиаспоральные группы в фокусе социополитического исследования // http://www.strategy-spb.ru/partner/files/mylnikov.pdf
6.Адылбекова Бекзада Узакбаевна, Байтиков Арсен Эрказыевич (2023) СТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОЕ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВНОЕ УКРЕПЛЕНИЕ ПАРТНЕРСТВА МЕЖДУ КЫРГЫЗСТАНОМ И УЗБЕКИСТАНОМ // ВОГУМ.. №2 (2). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strategicheskoe-i-perspektivnoe-ukreplenie-partnerstva-mezhdu-kyrgyzstanom-i-uzbekistanom (дата обращения: 12.07.2025).
