INTERPRETATION OF TEXT CREATION AS A TYPE OF DISCURSIVE ACTIVITY IS A DYNAMIC FEATURE OF THIS PHENOMENON
Main Article Content
Abstract
Interpretation of text creation as a type of discursive activity requires paying more attention to the dynamic features and process signs of this phenomenon. It is impossible to imagine the text as an unchanging, motionless, stable phenomenon. In order to determine the status and categorical features of the text, it is necessary to pay more attention to its aspects related to conscious discursive activity. As a result of a new approach to the interpretation of linguistic phenomena, the purpose of the research is to determine the aspects of text creation related to the human cognitive ability.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdurahmonov X., Mahmudov N. So`z estetikasi. – Toshkent : Fan, 1981.
Abdurahmonov Sh.A. O`zbek badiiy nutqida kulgu qo`zg`atuvchi lisoniy vositalar.- Toshkent, 1997.
Abdullayev A. Ozbek tilida ekspressivlikning ifodalanishi.- Toshkent, 1983.
Abdupattoyev M.T. O`zbek matnida supersintaktik butunliklar. – Toshkent 1998.
Boymirzayev S. Matn mazmunida temporallik semantikasi. – Toshkent: O`zME, 2009.
Galperin I.P. Tekst kak ob`ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya. – M.: Nauka, 1981.
Yo`dashev B. Matnni o`rganishning lingvostatistik metodlari. – Samarqand, 2008.
Yo`ldashev M. Badiiy matn va uning lingvopoetik tahlili asoslari. – Toshkent : Fan, 2007.
Yo`ldashev M. Yadgarov Q. Badiiy matnning lisoniy tahlili. Toshkent, TDPU, 2007.
Yoldashev M. Badiiy matn lingvopoetikasi. – Toshkent, Fan 2008.- 160 b.
Kamenskaya O.L.Tekst I kommunikatsiya. – M.:V`ssh.shk.,1990.
Lapasov J. Badiiy matn va lisoniy tahlil. – Toshkent:O`qituvchi,1995.
Lyapon M.V. Sm`slovaya struktura slojnogo predlojeniya I teksta. – M.:Nauka, 1986.
Mamajonov A. Tekst lingvistikasi. – Toshkent, TDPI, 1999.
Mamajonov A., Mahmudov U. Uslubiy vositalar. – Farg`ona, 1996.
Amarican Literary Criticism: An Anthology.M.: Progress Publishers, 1981.
Approaches to Poetics Ed.S. Chatman. N.Y.- L., Columbia U.P., 1973.
Arnold I., Dlakonova N. Three Centuries of English Prose. I.,1967.
Bennet A. Is the Novel Decaying?// Woolf V.Mrs. Dalloway and Essays. M.,Raduga Publishers,1984.
Ахмедов У. An analysis of the titles of works of art in English from the perspective of linguistic pragmatics and linguistic culture //Общество и инновации. – 2023. – Т. 4. – №. 1/S. – С. 236-240.
Akhmedov Umid. Restoration of name of works of art in English from the point of view of linguistics and linguo - cultural. International Journal of Social Science and Interdisciplinary. Research ISSN: 2277-3630 Impact Factor: 7.429. (2022/9/30,) 278-281.
Akhmedov Umid. Functional-semitic and lingucultural study of the names of works of art in the Uzbek language. International Journal of Social Science and Interdisciplinary. Research ISSN: 2277-3630 Impact Factor: 7.429.(2022/12/22) 398-400.