THE IMPORTANCE OF ENGLISH FOR THE STUDENTS OF AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTES

Main Article Content

Hasanova Shahnoza Zohirovna

Abstract

Language refers to a method of communication that allows for greater comprehension and communication, and learners should be proficient in at least two languages. In reality, college students should acquire and be proficient in at least one foreign language, including reading, speaking, listening, and writing. Because English is the most vital language for international communication, it is taught in Uzbekistan from basic to university level. This detailed analysis depicts the English teaching method in Uzbekistan's Agricultural Universities. Language is a required subject in all faculties at the undergraduate level. There are a few colleges that offer English as an optional subject, which is unusual. In this approach, communicative English has been selected for instruction. In the EFL classroom, 85% of teachers utilize a power point presentation and an overhead projector, while the rest use a white board and a marker.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasanova Shahnoza Zohirovna. (2023). THE IMPORTANCE OF ENGLISH FOR THE STUDENTS OF AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTES. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 11(6), 648–649. Retrieved from https://internationaljournals.co.in/index.php/giirj/article/view/4254
Section
Articles

References

Wright, 2010. Second Language Teacher Education: Review of Recent Research on Practice. Language Teaching 43 (3), 269-296, 2010.

Farooqui, S. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of textbook and teachers’ guide: A study in secondary education. Journal of Asia TEFL, 5 (4), 181-200.

Carless, D. R. (2004) A contextualized examination of target language use in the primary school foreign language classroom. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 104-119.

Kang, D. (2008). The classroom language use of a Korean elementary school EFL teacher: Another look at TETE. System, 38, 214-226.

Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37 (4), 589-613.

Orafi, S. M. S., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37, 243-253.

Shin, S. (2012) It cannot be done alone: The socialization of novice English teachers in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 46 (3), 542-567.

Su, Y. (2006). EFL teachers’ perceptions of English language policy at the elementary level in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 32 (3), 265-283.